link to NA official site

SECTION 1 -  Assignment Rules

1. Purpose
2. Tasks of the Registration Authority Italiana 
3. Domain names
4. Registration
5. Structure of the tree of Italian domain names
6. Registration Obligation
7. Reserved Names
8. Previous domain names and bookings
9. Assignment of a domain name
10. Transfer and modification of an assigned domain name
11. Annulment of the assignment of a domain name
   11.1 Annulment as a result of renunciation
   11.2 Official annulment
   11.3 Annulment in view of judicial sentence or arbitration decision
12. Suspension of the assignation of a domain name
   12.1 Suspension on orders from the authorities
   12.2 Suspension upon request of the assignee
   12.3 Suspension of a just assigned domain name
13. Documentation for the assignment of a domain name
   13.1 Letter of assumption of responsibility
   13.2 Verification of the documentation
   13.3 Failure to present the documents requested by the RA
   13.4 Publication of the forms and instructions

      SECTION 2  -  Resolution of Disputes

14. Disputation Procedure
   14.1 Introduction to disputation
   14.2 Procedures of the Registration Authority in the instance of dispute
   14.3 Pending Dispute
   14.4 Dispute Resolved
   14.5 Effects of the resolution of the dispute
   14.6 Reassignment of the disputed and removed domain name
15. Arbitration Committee
   15.1. Arbitration clause
   15.2 Constitution of the arbitration body
   15.3 Composition of the arbitration body
   15.4 Procedure before the arbitration body
   15.5 Safeguarding powers and instructors of the arbitration body
   15.6 Decision of the arbitration body
   15.7 Compensation of the arbitration body and expenses.
16. Disputed domain name reassignment procedure 
   16.1 Enforceability of procedure
   16.2 Nature of procedure
   16.3 Procedure, arbitration and appeal to the court of law.
   16.4 Sources of procedure
   16.5 Supervision of administrators
   16.6 Transfer of a disputed domain name 
   16.7 Proof of registration and maintenance of the domain in bad faith 
   16.8 Multiple procedures
   16.9 Role of the Naming Authority 
   16.10 Publication of deliberations 
   16.11 Enforcement of deliberation
   16.12 Cost of procedure 
17. Procedure administrators' requirements
   17.1 Subjective requirements
   17.2 Submission of applications
   17.3 Acceptance of application
   17.4 Qualification for administration of procedures
   17.5 Revocation of qualification 
 

The present Rules contain the norms for the assignment of domain names within the ccTLD "it" (Italy), both for the Internet Protocol Suite (IPS) standard and the Open System Interconnection (OSI) standard. 

The following Rules and the procedures which constitute the base of the Registration Authority Italiana (RA) operations are defined by the Naming Authority Italiana (NA).

Declaratory note: the principal concepts and terms used in these Rules, in the Technical Registration Procedures and in the referenced documents are described in a specially created "Tutorial" available from the NA. The tutorial is by no way part of the regulations and cannot be used as a probe document; it is made available to the readers for a purely didactic informative purpose.

The RA manages and maintain the database of domain names under the ccTLD "it", also named as "Registro dei Nomi Assegnati" (Assigned Names Registry) (RNA). The general RA operating procedures are drawn from the ISO 9834-1, RFC1591 and ICANN ICP-1 specification, and their subsequent updates.

The RA must verify that domain name assignment requests conform to the Rules and Technical Registration Procedures.

The RA provides for the registration and assignment in use of the following objects related to domain names within the ccTLD "it" (ISO 3166), including the geographic section:

• a) domain names according to the ISO/IEC 10021 standard and subsequent updates;
• b) domain names according to the IPS RFC822, RFC1034, RFC1035 standards and subsequent updates;
• c) mapping rules between the ISO/IEC 10021 (ITU X.400) and IPS RFC822 standards according to the IPS MIXER (RFC2156) standard and subsequent updates;
• d) "relative distinguished names" according to the ITU X.500 standard and subsequent updates.

Domain names are assigned by the RA to registrants following the requests chronological order, as defined by the Technical Registration Procedures 

Domain names have the only purpouse to identify uniquely groups of objects (services, machines, post boxes etc.) located on the net.

Domain names within the ccTLD "it" can be assigned to subjects belonging to a member state of the European Union. Associations without VAT numbers or fiscal code (or equivalent) and persons not owning a VAT number (or equivalent) can register a single domain name, only.

Domain names can be assigned directly under the ccTLD "it" or else under the predefined geographic structure.

The predefined geographic structure is constructed with the names and abbreviations of the Italian provinces and regions, as well, under the provinces, as the names of Italian councils.

The domain names which constitute the predefined geographic structure form a hierarchical container for other domain names (functionally equivalent to a ccTLD or gTLD) and as such are not assignable.

The complete geographic structure of the tree of Italian domain names is given in the document "Reserved Domain Names" available from the NA.

For all domain names placed directly under the ccTLD "it" or directly under the predefined geographic structure registration with the RA is obligatory.

Some domain names are reserved, and as such are not assignable, or are assignable only to predetermined subjects.

Domain names constituted by only one or two characters are not assignable:

• directly under the ccTLD "it" (IPS);
• as a PRMD (ISO/IEC 10021) field;
• as an Org (X.500) field;

The domain names, listed in the reserved domain names and belonging to the predefined geographic structure registered in a date older than their definition as reserved names, can be used by the assegnee for at maximum of one year after the date they have been declared as reserved names.Afterwards, these names will be used as described into the naming rules and procedures.

The domain names already registered which correspond to a gTLD remain assigned to the current assignee. However no SLD, in whichever way activated, can be given to third parties, different from the assignee.

Domain names cannot be booked.

A domain name assigned within the name space under the ccTLD "it" cannot be considered as prereserved in other positions of the same name tree.

The domain name assignment procedure concludes when it is loaded into the RAN. This is effected only when the RA has received all of the documentation requested and the effective functionality of the name has been verified, i.e.:

• the correct operation of the authoritative nameservers of the domain name and the accessibility of the "postmaster" address for the domain name in the case of IPS and ISO/IEC 10021;
• the correct operation and the accessibility of the DSA in the case of ITU X.500.

A domain name can be transferred upon agreement of the parties, or following a specific or universal succession, or at the end of a reassignment procedure run in accordance with art.16. It is anyhow forbidden to forestall and cybersquat domain names.

A suspended or challenged domain name according to art.14 can be transferred only to the subject that has submitted it to the challenge procedure. Once the challenged status of a domain name is over, the assignee can transfer it to anybody.

Universal or specific succession cases excepted, a modification request of an assigned domain name, including the position change within the Italian domain name tree, is considered in all respects as a cancellation of the domain name previously assigned joint with a new domain name request.

The RA may annul the assignation of a domain name only:

• a) following renunciation on the part of the assignee; or
• b) officially
• c) following judicial sentence of arbitration decision.

Where annulment is a result of renunciation of the domain name on the part of the assignee, if requested by the assignee the RA is obliged to ensure the maintenance of the old domain name for a maximum period of six months.

The RA officially annuls the assignment of a domain name in the following cases:

•  - shortcoming of the objective and subjective elements which have determined the assignment of a domain in the ccTLD "it", where expected;
•  - failure to present the documents requested by the RA according to article 13.3 below:
•  - failure to present the documents requested by the RA according to article 3.2 in the Technical Registration Procedures;
•  - the non "visibility/accessibility", for more than 3 months, of the objects belonging to the assigned domain name (or the non functioning of the authoritative name serves given into the technical registation module deposited into the RNA or their misconfiguration accordingly to section 1.4 of the thecnical registration procedures or the unreachability of the e-mail address "postmaster@<registered domain name>.it").  The verification of this missing visibility/accessibility shall be technically made by RA, by default or upon a third party written request. In this case the domain name cannot be reassigned to others within a month from the date of annulment.
•  - violation of the last paragraph in section 7 of the naming rules.

The RA annuls the assignment of a domain name in view of a judicial sentence or arbitration decision which establishes that the assignee did not have rights to its use. A suspended domain name cannot be reassigned for others until its annulment.

A domain name annulled according to the substance of the previous comma is immediately rendered available for assignment to subjects other that the previous assignee, except in the case of explicit indication to the contrary expressed within the judicial sentence or arbitration decision.

The RA can suspend the assignation of a domain name only:

• a) on orders from the authorities, or
• b) upon request by the assignee.
• c) on the event specific in art. 12.3

The RA suspends the assignation of a domain name on orders from the judicial Authorities noted to them in legal terms, or cautionary precautions communicated by the arbitration body, wherewith the use of the domain name on the part of the assignee is inhibited.

The domain name thus suspended is reactivated for the original assignee only in view of an executive proceeding on the part of the judicial or arbitration authority rejecting the requests of whomsoever disputed the legitimacy of its use, or in view of the demonstration that the procedure, in the ambit of which the suspension order was issued, has been extinguished.

The domain name suspended in accordance with the substance of the first comma of the present article is revoked by the RA only in view of a judicial sentence or arbitration decision which confirms the act of suspension or declares that the assignee did not have rights to its use. 

The RA suspends a domain name upon request by the assignee whose use of the same is disputed judicially.

In this hypothesis, the RA is bound to reactivate the domain name for the original assignee upon request by the same.

Contemporarily to the assignation of a domain name, the RA, whenever it forsee the need and urgency of a verification of the statements made by the assignee into the AR letter, can request the verification of the documents as specified in art. 13.2 and suspend the domain name while waiting for documents themeselves.

The RA, upon completion of the verifications specified in art. 13.2, must re-enable the domain name to the assignee, or, in the hypothesis described in art. 13.3, to revoke the assignation.

The request for a new domain name is made by way of an electronic form containing the technical data necessary to its functionality and operation forwarded by the provider/maintainer of the domain name to the RA and a predefined letter of assumption of responsibility forwarded by the domain name requester.

The RA accepts assignment requests only when accompanied by the above-mentioned documentation, compiled in accordance with the instructions.

The assignee of a domain name assumes full civil and penal responsibility for the use of the same. To this end the requester is obliged to forward to the RA a letter of assumption of responsibility (AR letter) according to the format given by the RA.

In the AR letter the identificational data of the requester must be given. The requester must also declare knowledge of the fundamental principals of use of the resources and of the Internet, the norms given by the NA and the principles expressed in the document "Netiquette" (available from the NA) and must pledge to respect them.

In the AR letter, the requester may devolve the controversies relative to the requested domain name to the arbitration committee constituted by the RA.

The RA, at its discretion, can request that it be furnished with documents confirming declarations made in the AR letter.

Such documents must be received by the RA within 15 days from the request. For foreign assignees the above term is doubled.

It is the faculty of the RA to annul the assignment of the domain name where:

• the documentation is not received by the RA on schedule; or
• the requester refuses to send the documentation; or
• it emerges that the declarations made by the requester do not correspond 
• to the truth.

The RA is obliged to render public and maintain on line on its own servers the models for the forms and the letter of assumption of responsibility, as well as the instructions for the registration of domain names and further necessary particulars.
 

Anyone can dispute with the RA the domain names assigned by it and in use in the RAN.

A dispute is begun by letter forwarded by registered post to the RA by complainants professing to have been the subject to prejudice as a result of an object  assigned in use to (an) other(s).

The letter of dispute must contain the generalities of the sender, the domain name disputed, the reasons for the dispute, the prejudice to which the sender has been subject or the rights which are assumed by the same to have been breached.

In the presence of a dispute, the RA adds the note "valore contestato/challenged value" to the value contained in the RAN, and notes there also the date of the beginning of the dispute in a special file which, though not accessible to the public, can be obtained on request.

Furthermore, within 10 working days of receipt of the dispute, the RA informs the assignee via e-mail of the dispute, and invites both parties to begin arbitration procedure in accordance with article 15 or a domain name riassignement administrative procedure in accordance with article 16,

The communication to the assignee of the object disputed must contain all of the information relevant to the dispute, including the data unavailable for public access in the RAN.

The RA is obliged to furnish all of the data and documentation relative to the object disputed to the party who requests it, subject to repayment of expenses.

The RA does not participate in the resolution of a dispute, which, where it cannot be brought about amicably, can be devolved by the interested parties to the arbitration body, for which see article 15, or by action of the challenger activating an adrministrative procedure as described in article 16. The RA is not obliged to act in any further way until the dispute has been resolved.

Pending dispute, the initiating party is obliged to confirm to the RA at least once every six months its wish to keep the dispute pending and its continued interest in the object disputed. Failing this, the RA will consider the dispute resolved, unless it received communication of an existing pending judgement, arbitration or administrative procedure regarding that domain name.

The RA considers a dispute resolved in the moment in which:

• 1. it receives a communication to this effect from all of the interested parties; or
• 2. it receives an arbitration decision from the president of the arbitration body on the question in conformance with the dictates of article 15.6 of these rules; or
• 3. it receives notification of judicial sentence on the part of the judicial authority, or arbitration decision which resolves the question; or
• 4. it receives a communication from the disputing party declaring the intention to abandon the dispute; or
• 5. the previous assignee of the object disputed renounces the assignment; or
• 6. the challenged domain name is in the NO-PROVIDER-MNT state and the 3 months described in art. 3.2 of the Technical Procedures of Registration have passed without the RA receiving from the assignee further communication regarding the domain registration; or
• 7. one of the parties offers proof of the extinction of the judiciary procedure undertaken for the resolution of the controversy; or
• 8. 6 months pass from the moment in which the dispute was begun without any communication from the disputing party reaffirming the intention to maintain the dispute; or
• 9. 6 months pass from the last reaffirmation of intention to maintain the dispute; or
• 10. it receives the decision statement about an administrative procedure, as described in art. 16, which transfers the domain name to the challenger party; or
• 11. it receives the decision statement about an administrative procedure, as described in art. 16, which rejects the challenge.

Once the dispute has been resolved in accordance with the substance of article 14.4, the RA:

a - if the resolution has come about

•    on the basis of points "4", "7", "8", "9" or "11" of article 14.4, or
•    on the basis of point "10" of the preceding article 14.4, or
•    n the basis of points "2" or "3" of the preceding article 14.4  and the sentence or arbitration decision are favourable to the assignee resisting the dispute, or 
•     on the basis of point "1" of the preceding article 14.4 and the parties agree as to the legitimacy of the registration of the assignee resisting the dispute,

b - if the resolution has come about

•     on the basis of points "2" or "3" of the preceding article 14.4 and the sentence or arbitration decision are favourable to the challenger, or 
•     on the basis of point "9" of the preceding article 14.4, or
•     on the basis of point "1" of the preceding article 14.4 and the parties agree as to the illegitimacy of the registration of the assignee resisting the dispute, or 
•     on the basis of point "5", "6", "10" or "12" of the preceding article 14.4

In the cases covered by point "b" of the preceding article 14.5, the removal of the domain name under dispute does not lead to its automatic assignment to the party which initiated the dispute.

Once the dispute has been resolved, the RA does not render available the disputed domain name for at least 30 days. The RA must also invite, not more than 10 working days after the resolution of the dispute, the disputing party to begin normal procedure for the assignment of the domain name. If the procedure is not initiated within 30 days from the resolution of the dispute, then the domain name cannot be reassigned to any body which makes request for it to the RA.

Whomsoever requests a domain name with the RA may engage, in the AR letter or in a successive act, in the devolution to an informal arbitrator of the eventual controversies connected to the assignment of the domain name in question in accordance with the present naming rules, recognising as valid and binding the decisions made by the arbitration body.

An arbitration body is formed by the NA. The committee is composed of those members of the NA who have asked the president to be allowed to take part, excluding the president, the vice-president and the Executive Committee Director on duty.

The list of the arbiters nominated by the Executive Committee who are members of the arbitration committee is available from the secretary of the NA.

The arbitration body is composed of three arbiters who are members of the arbitration committee; one member is chosen by each disputing party while the third, who acts as president of the arbitration body, is chosen by the two aforechosen arbiters. 

The party wishing to initiate arbitration procedure is obliged to proceed with the nomination of an arbiter via registered post letter forwarded to the defendant, to the arbiter nominated and to the President of the NA. The letter must include the name of the chosen arbiter among those who make up the arbitration committee, the object of the question to be submitted to the arbitration body, the factual and legal reasons on which it is founded, conclusions, domestic address and e-mail address, as well as the invitation to the other party to nominate an arbiter from the members of the arbitration committee.

The party to whom the invitation to nominate an arbiter is addressed is obliged to do so, in accordance with the procedures given in the previous comma, within 10 working days of receipt. Failing this, the party submitting said invitation may ask for the nomination to be made by the President of the NA, who will proceed with the nomination of an arbiter within 5 working days from the request. The nomination is communicated to the parties via e-mail.

The party arbiters thus nominated choose the president of the arbitration body within five working days of the latest nomination on the part of the disputing bodies. Where this choice is not made in time the more diligent party may ask for the nomination of the third arbiter to be made by the President of the NA, who will proceed with the nomination of an arbiter within 5 working days from the request. The nomination is communicated to 
the parties via e-mail.

The arbitration body is considered constituted from the day following the acceptance of the task on the part of the president of the same body.

The arbiters must come to a decision within 90 days of the constitution of the arbitration body.

The president of the body may nominate a secretary to assist during the process and take minutes of the sittings in which the parties or their representatives are heard.

The arbitration body may regulate the process of judgement in the manner it maintains most appropriate, as long as respect for the examination is assured. It is in all cases obliged to concede a period not less than 10 working days to each party to present their respective defences and documentation, and a further period not less than 10 working days for responses, as well as to convoke personally the parties and hear them in examination where this is requested by one or both of them. Before the arbitration body either party may be represented by another person, except where the arbitration body deems it necessary for them to be heard in person.

Communications of the arbitration body to the parties, the exchange of minutes and responses may take place via e-mail, except where the parties explicitly request paper documentation, or where it is necessary to exchange or examine original documentation which cannot be transmitted via e-mail.

Where there are serious reasons, upon request from one of the parties the arbitration body may take safeguarding measures relative to the domain name and to the assigned domain name under dispute. The RA is obliged to put such measures into place immediately.

Where instruction is necessary, the arbitration body may delegate the proceedings of instruction to one only of the arbiters. The RA is bound to furnish the arbitration body with all of the information requested.

The arbiters pass judgement according to equity, in the quality of amicable components, on the basis of the present naming rules and the Italian ordination norms.

The president of the arbitration body informs the parties, the President and Executive Committee of the NA and the RA of the definitive decision via registered post. The decisions of the arbitration body are kept by the secretary of the NA and are placed at the disposal of the members of the arbitration body. The arbitration decision is rendered public by the president of the NA, except where the arbitration body, upon request from one of the parties, decides to the contrary.

The decision of the arbitration body is unappealable.

The decisions of the arbitration body are put into execution by the RA within five working days of the receipt of the same.
 

Upon the decision, the arbiters liquidate their compensation along with that of the secretary of the body, charging them, partially or entirely, to the losing party. On request of either one of the parties, the body may order the losing party to compensate, partially or in total, the expenses sustained by the winning party, determining them, if necessary, according to fairness.

The compensation which the arbitration body liquidates to the arbiters for the judgement cannot be superior to half of the maximum set out by the current forensic tariff at the moment of the decision.

The claimant may request that the registered domains, which have been challenged under art. 14, undergo this Reassignment procedure.

The administrative procedure is applicable to all domain names registered under the ccTLD "it".
 

The purpose of the procedure is to check the entitlement to use or legal availability of the domain name by the registrant, and that the domain has not been registered and is not maintained in bad faith.

The only possible result of the procedure is the domain name reassignement.

The procedure is not of a jurisdictional nature, and, as such, does not prevent the parties from appealing, even at a later time, to the court of law or arbitration as provided by art. 15 of the naming rules. 
 

The procedure shall be enforced and administered by special organisations, called the "administrators", provided they fulfil the requirements established by the Naming Authority.

Those who challenge a domain name shall be responsible for the selection of an administrator to enforce and administer the procedure. All costs related to the procedure shall be the sole responsibility of those who dispute a domain name. 

The procedure cannot be started pending another judgement related to the disputed domain name before the ordinary judge or the board of arbitrators, as provided by art.15 of the naming rules. If a judgement is filed before the ordinary judge or an arbitration procedure is started as provided by art. 15 of the naming rules pending the Procedure, then the Procedure shall be extinguished. 
 

The Procedure shall be ruled by: 

• a) these naming rules; 
• b) the rules contained in the document "Domain name reassignment procedure", which are an integral part of the naming rules; 
• c) the optional implementation provisions set forth by the administrators and approved of to the purposes of art.16.5, sub-section II, below.

16.5 Supervision of administrators

The NA President shall be responsible for checking the requirements of the organisations which apply for the enforcement and administration of a Procedure and for checking the work of such organisations. If an administrator repeatedly breaches the procedural or merit rules, the NA President may exempt the administrator from the administration of the procedures. 

The procedures shall cover any domain name with respect to which a third party hereinafter referred to as the "claimant") states the following: 

• a) that the disputed domain name is the same or such as to mislead with respect to a trade mark on which the claimant claims rights, or with respect to the claimant's name and surname; and that
• b) the existing assignee (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") has no right or title with respect to the disputed domain name; and,  finally, that 
• c) the domain name has been registered and is used in bad faith. 

With respect to the point b) above of this article, the defendant shall be deemed as entitled to the disputed domain name if the defendant proves that: 

• 1) before being informed of the dispute, he used om good faith or objectively  got ready to use the domain name or a name corresponding to the same to supply goods and services to the public; or
• 2) that he is known personally, as an association or commercial organisation, with the name which corresponds to the registered domain name, even if he has not registered the related trade mark; or 
• 3) that he is making lawful use of the domain name for non-commercial purposes, or for commercial purposes without the intention to mislead the claimant's customers or breach the claimant's registered trade mark. 

 

16.7 Proof of registration and maintenance of the domain in bad faith 

• a) Any circumstance which may cause the domain name to be considered as having been registered for the main purpose to sell, transfer the domain name for use or otherwise, to the claimant (who holds rights in the trade mark or name) or one of his competitors, for a consideration, either money or other, exceeding the costs reasonably incurred into by  the defendant for registration and maintenance of the domain name; 
• b) The circumstance of the domain having been registered by the defendant in order to prevent the holder of an identical trade mark from registering such domain name as his own, and it being used for activities which compete with the claimant's activities; 
• c) The circumstance of the domain name having been registered by the defendant for the main purpose of damaging a competitor's business or usurp the claimant's name and surname; 
• d) The circumstance of the domain name having been expressly used to attract Internet users, for profit, by originating reasons for confusing it with the claimant's trade mark. 

If multiple procedures are started with respect to one domain name, those which have been started after the first one shall be suspended pending the outcome of the first one started. If the first procedure started concludes with the transfer of the disputed domain name to the claimant, the other procedures shall be extinguished. 

The Naming Authority has no relation to the procedure and shall not be responsible for the work of the administrators which enforce the procedures. 

The list of pending procedurs and the deliberations on the procedures shall be made public in the web site of the Naming Authority and in the web site of the administrator to which the deliberating board belongs, unless such board, under exceptional circumstances and by taking justified measures, decides not to publish all or part of it. 

If the board decides that the disputed domain name is to be reassigned, the board's deliberation shall be enforced by the Registration Authority (and the rules under articles 15.5 and 14.6 shall apply), unless the latter receives, within 15 days from reception of the board's deliberation, a suitably documented release from the defendant that the defendant has filed legal proceedings or arbitration with respect to the disputed domain name. In the case - it allowed for the specific case - the defendant which filed the legal proceedings wished to use the terms given in the following third paragraph, they shall submit an explicit and documented declaration inside the communication to the RA.

The documented release described in the previous sub-section must be supported within 10 days by the photo-copy of the official act notification introducing the judgement. In case the above documentation is not produced within 10 days, or if the judgment has started later than the terms specified in the first sub-section, the RA shall proceed with the domain name reassignement.

In the exclusive case there the notification of the legal action shall be sent from or to different countries, the term to provide the copy of the notified act (after which term the RA will re-assigne the domain name) is changed into 30 days, starting from the data when the RA has received the notification described in the first paragraph on this article.

If the legal proceedings or arbitration filed by the defendant are extinguished, the Registration Authority shall enforce the board's deliberation on the claimant's request. 

The cost of procedure shall amount to at least 400 euros (plus V.A.T., if applicable). 5% of the cost shall belong to to NA, as a lump-sum reimbursement of the costs incurred for the enforcement of deliberations. 

The Procedures may be enforced by public or individual legal persons or by professional firms incorporated in the European Union. 

Applications for admission to the administration of procedures shall be submitted to the President of the Naming Authority, who shall decide within 20 days from the submission of the applications. 

The application shall indicate: 

• a) The administrator's name and legal representative; 
• b) Date of incorporation; 
• c) Name and address of the person in charge of the administration of procedures; 
• d) The criteria which have been and which shall be followed by the administrator in the selection of his arbitrators; 
• e) The administrator's URL; 
• f) Number of Procedures the administrator considers he will be able to administrate monthly; 
• g) Cost of Procedure in the event of a single-person board or three-people board. 

• a) that the administrator shall be subject to the rules laid down by the Naming Authority and accepts any variation that should be made to them over time; 
• b) that the arbitrators listed are familiar with the naming rules and the rules laid down for the enforcement of the procedures; 
• c) that his arbitrators are free to act on their own right also with other administrators. 

The application shall enclose the following: 

• a) A list of at least 15 people, with the relevant qualifications, who accept to act as arbitrators in domain name reassignment procedures; 
• b) The text of any enforcement rule that the administrator intends to follow during the enforcement of the Procedures. 
• c) the arbitrators' acceptance of being included in the list under point a) of this sub-section. 

In submitting the application, the administrator shall make accessible to the NA President the URL where the indications contained in the application and the annexes as per points a) and b) of the sub-section above of this article are published. 

The President of the Naming Authority, after evaluating the opportunity to evaluate new administrators with respect to the needs of the ccTLD "it, shall accept the applications and authorise the administrators whose applications comply with the provisions laid down by art. 17.2 and whose enforcement rules, if any, do not conflict with the naming rules.

The rejection of the application shall be justified and shall not prevent the administrator from submitting a new application. 

The candidate administrators whose requests were rejects for opportunity reasons, shall be notified whenever the rejection motivation are no more valid.

The acceptance of the application shall authorise the applicant to administrate the procedures. The administrator shall be authorised to start working as such, provided he publicly opens the URL, under art 17.2, last sub-section, of the indications contained in the applications and annexes under art. 17.2 sub-section IV, points a) and b).

The President of the Naming Authority shall revoke the qualification for the administration of procedures under the following circumstances: 

• a) the administrator is subject to winding-up or bankruptcy proceedings; 
• b) the number of his arbitrators drops below 15; 
• c) the boards are proved to have generally breached the procedural    rules; 
• d) the information supplied in the application is proved to be false.